tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6321054920964780245.post5829189173734491323..comments2023-10-25T02:29:35.524-07:00Comments on Livi Wilmore CG Arts & Animation: Le Bélle et Le Bette Film ReviewAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00717890309388844969noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6321054920964780245.post-1468215831132259832013-11-05T02:09:24.979-08:002013-11-05T02:09:24.979-08:00Ah right ok :) i'll get it right one week!Ah right ok :) i'll get it right one week!<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00717890309388844969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6321054920964780245.post-90481832814162868162013-11-04T22:09:02.815-08:002013-11-04T22:09:02.815-08:00Hi Livi,
A couple of points in regard to this rev...Hi Livi,<br /><br />A couple of points in regard to this review - firstly, a good linking of the concept art to the actual production... :)<br />As far as labelling your images, put the fig 1, fig 2 etc by the actual picture, just to keep it nice and clear. It would also be a good idea to make sure you link all the images in to the text - at the moment, you have a somewhat random image of Ophelia in there, but have not specifically said what this refers to (always assume your reader knows nothing!)<br /><br />Keep your image list separate from your text bibliography, and double-check the conventions for creating the image list here - it is quite specific about what is required, and in what order. <br /><br />http://community.ucreative.ac.uk/article/27187/Referencing<br /><br /><br />You have a couple of issues with your referencing; some of your quotes do not have the date after them, and one is not referenced at all. This could be because what you have here, is 'secondary referencing', ie you have taken a quote by Coctaeu, but it is quoted in someone else's piece. It is always best to try and go to the primary source if you can, but if not, this is how the referencing guide says you should do it...<br /><br />Secondary referencing (a quotation found in a text not by the author of the text).<br /><br />If you can't find the original source, you need to reference the author who is included in your bibliography, and also the author of the original quotation. <br /><br />In the text, any of these formats is acceptable:<br /><br />'There is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.'(Foucault 1978, cited in Sheridan, 1980:138)<br /><br />OR <br /><br />Foucault (1978) argues that 'there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.' (Sheridan, 1980:138)<br /><br />In your bibliography it is the author of the book that needs to be included, in this case:<br /><br />Sheridan, Alan (1980) Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.<br /><br />So in your case, you have Cocteau quoted in a piece by Josefina García Pullés in 2011, with the date that Cocteau said what he said unknown, so your reference in the text would look like this - <br />(Cocteau, s.d., cited in Pullés, 2011)<br /><br />Your bibliography would then be listed under Pullés, J.G. , with the details of the website or publication you found the material.<br />Similarly, the quote about the cinematographer - that comes from a piece by Derek Malcolm, in the Guardian, so it would be (Cocteau, 1946, cited in Malcolm, D. 1999)<br /><br />Does that make sense??! Jackiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13332181835614441447noreply@blogger.com